The volatility adaptive trend-following with mean-reversion strategy trades futures contracts in the daily timeframe.
In another article we included a mean-reversion strategy for futures based on our PSI5 algo. The strategy traded long-only ES (E-mini S&P 500), ZN (10-Year U.S. T-Note), FESX (EURO STOXX 50) and FGBL (Euro-Bund) futures contracts.
The PSI algo is based on a formula from a text in probability theory and it is available for sale to professional traders and hedge funds only subject to acceptance of a non-disclosure agreement. The volatility adaptive trend-following algo is offered at a discount with a purchase of PSI5 algo but also sold separately.
In this article we add volatility adaptive trend-following to the strategy. In effect, we limit mean-reversion to time periods when prices are not trending up. We then compare the results to those of the strategy with mean-reversion only.
Strategy backtest settings
Time-frame: Daily (back adjusted futures data)
Strategy type: Volatility adaptive trend-following with mean-reversion, long-only
Contracts: ES, ZN, FGSX and FGBL
Backtest period: 01/03/2000 – 12/24/2019
Maximum open positions: 4
Initial capital: $100K
Position size : One contract or one contract per $100K of equity
Trade entry: Open of next bar (no look-ahead bias)
Correction filter: Price > 200-day moving average
Case 1: Constant position size of one contract
The strategy performed well during 2008 bear market and 2011 correction offering tail risk hedge for equities.
The table below compares the combined strategy (AMAV + PSI5) to the strategy with mean-reversion (PSI5) only and with correction filter.
The combined strategy provides much higher returns but at higher drawdown as expected. Choosing between the two strategies is a matter of risk preference.
Case 2: One additional contract per $100K of equity gains, 7% stop-loss
The strategy generated high returns in 2008 bear market and 2011 correction with very small increase in maximum drawdown. CAGR is about 75% higher than in Case 1.
The table below compares the combined strategy (AMAV + PSI5) to the strategy with mean-reversion (PSI5) only and with correction filter, when in both cases the number of contracts in increased by one for every $100K of profits.
The combined strategy with variable position size generated much higher returns than PSI only strategy but at higher drawdown as expected. Choosing between the two strategies is a matter of risk preference.
The stop-loss and correction filter can be adjusted to satisfy different risk criteria. In the article we included only our specific choice, 7% for the former and price > 200-day moving average for the latter.
The volatility adaptive trend-following and PSI5 algos work well across equities and selected futures. Click here for more articles.
Charting and backtesting program: Amibroker
Data provider: Norgate Data
Technical and quantitative analysis of major stock indexes and 34 popular ETFs are included in our Weekly Premium Reports. Market signals for position traders are offered by our premium Market Signals service